Raw

Hi Danny,



I'm not quite sure what point you are making in relation to RDFa, but if you are saying that it will have problems unless it mandates the use of <code>@profile</code>, then I have to disagree.



Since RDFa is based on RDF, then everything is a URI, which means that it is <em>already</em> in the form that you seem to favour.



This means that there is no need to mandate the use of <code>@profile</code>, at least in relation to the question of ambiguity, since RDFa does not have the same problems in this area that microformats does. I explain this in more detail in <a href="http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/2007/12/rdfa-profile-and-following-your-nose.html">RDFa, @profile and following your nose</a>.



Regards,



Mark



--

Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer



mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232

http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com



standards. innovation.@en